Dear Barrister TUAW: Psystar, matters of fact, and appellate cases

Dear Barrister TUAW: Psystar, matters of fact, and appellate cases

Filed under: , , ,

Dear Auntie Barrister TUAW,

I’ve been following your coverage of the Psystar case and I’m a little confused by the discussion on your last post. I’ve always thought the original case to be one of fact and an appellate case one of law. This, to me, would mean that in the appellate process they would not argue the case again at all. It would all be based on if the legal decision in the original case was rendered improperly.

So all the sturm and drang would be gone, No?

With love & kisses,

David

Read on for Barrister TUAW, esq’s response

Continue reading Dear Barrister TUAW: Psystar, matters of fact, and appellate cases

TUAWDear Barrister TUAW: Psystar, matters of fact, and appellate cases originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Read the whole story…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Leave a Reply

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline
Powered by WP VideoTube
Powered by Yahoo! Answers